Technology for healthcare
Secure, compliance-ready systems for providers and payers — patient platforms, health-data integration, and analytics built around privacy.
Care systems built around privacy
Healthcare runs on trust and on data that must never leak. We build clinical and patient-facing systems that keep protected health information safe while making it flow where care teams need it.
From HIPAA-aligned patient portals to EHR integration and telehealth, we treat privacy and interoperability as design constraints — not afterthoughts.
Built for healthcare
Clinical and patient-facing systems that put privacy first.
HIPAA-Aligned Architecture
Architecture, encryption, and controls that keep protected health information safe by design.
Patient Portals
Self-service portals for appointments, records, results, and secure provider contact.
EHR & Health-Data Integration
HL7 and FHIR interfaces that connect EHRs, labs, and health systems safely.
Telehealth Platforms
Secure video consultations, scheduling, and remote care built for clinical workflows.
Secure Messaging
Encrypted, compliant communication between patients, clinicians, and care teams.
Health Analytics
Dashboards and reporting that turn clinical and operational data into safe, actionable insight.
Architected to healthcare privacy requirements
Systems we deliver can be architected to support the applicable requirements — including the Philippine Data Privacy Act (RA 10173), GDPR, ISO 27001 controls and sector-specific security requirements.
ITDC Systems is ISO/IEC 27001 certified across our full operations, including infrastructure services. The other items listed are frameworks and standards we design and build to on client engagements, not certifications ITDC holds. See our credentials →
Frequently asked questions
That the design implements HIPAA's safeguards — access control, audit trails, encryption in transit and at rest, minimum necessary access — as engineering requirements. It is an architectural alignment and not a certification: compliance with HIPAA is a property of the covered entity's whole operation, not of any software component within it.
Health information is sensitive personal information under RA 10173, which raises the bar: processing generally needs consent or a specific statutory basis, and penalties for unauthorised processing are higher. Consent capture, retention limits and access logging therefore belong in the data model rather than in a policy document.
Where the EHR exposes an interface, yes — HL7 or FHIR where available, a documented adapter where not. The binding constraint is usually the vendor's licensing of that interface rather than the technical work, so establish what the EHR contract permits before scoping the portal.
Identity verification of both parties, a clinical record written back to the patient's file, prescription handling where applicable, and a defined fallback when the connection fails. The video call is the least difficult part; the record-keeping and the failure path determine whether it is usable in practice.
Anonymisation has to be genuine to remove the obligation, and re-identification from a small population is easier than it looks — a date of birth, a barangay and a diagnosis is frequently unique. Treat de-identified analytics data as still in scope until a re-identification risk assessment says otherwise.
Building for patient care?
Tell us what you're building for patients and care teams. We'll bring the security, compliance, and reliability it demands.